Organize Your Family History

Stay focused and happy while exploring your roots

How’s the 30 x 30 challenge going?

By 4 Comments

For those of you who are participating in this month’s 30 x 30 challenge, in which we’re trying to do 30 minutes of genealogy research every day for 30 days, please report in! Are you able to research every day? Or most days anyway? Have you found it to be beneficial?

This has been an especially good challenge month for me. I’ve been to carve out time first thing in the morning most mornings. I think it helps that it gets light so early, so it’s easy to get extra early to make time for research. So far, I haven’t missed a day. My timer has been really helpful, so that I don’t get lost in the research.

In addition to researching for 30 minutes, I challenged myself to log my research daily and note next steps at the end of each session. That has been hugely helpful, because each morning I turn to the previous day’s entry and I know what to work on.

Primarily I’ve been transcribing my great great grandfather’s Civil War pension file this month, but I have taken a few forays into investigating his son and granddaughter (the brother and niece of my great grandfather) to fill in some blanks in my ancestor’s timeline. The light is shining at the end of the tunnel: So far I’ve transcribed 106 of the pension file’s 138 documents. I’d love to be able to finish the transcription project in June. (I’ve transcribed 16 documents in June so far.) We shall see if that’s possible.

I love starting the day with genealogy research. I’m growing to love my (very informal) research log. And I’m feeling really connected with the research, which makes it easier to get started.

I hope those of you who said you were up to the challenge are seeing similar benefits! Even if you’re not managing to research daily, I think keeping it top of mind with the challenge can be very helpful. I’d love to hear about your experiences!

Formal citations: Do it for those who follow

By 18 Comments

In response to my blog post, How Important are Formal Citations?, reader Karen Cavanaugh sent me an excellent email about why she’s taken the trouble to format her sources in the format prescribed by Evidence Explained and how she makes it easier on herself. I liked it so much, I asked whether I could turn it into a guest post. She graciously said yes, so I present to you Organize Your Family History’s  first guest post. Take it away, Karen!

I had been aware of the Evidence Explained book and used the website in the past but resisted implementing the standard in documenting my sources as it seemed so demanding and required more detail than I was accustomed to doing.  I found it too tedious to master and just the weight and scope of the book made it harder to commit.

But one day as I was organizing some files I found an old family history created by a distant cousin using the old Family Tree Maker.  It included some new information on my family and boy, was I excited.  Until I looked at sources.  Dismay!  The sources were so skimpy as to be useless – I had a hard time deciphering them.  I made calls to libraries and repositories in the respective area but no one could identify the one citation I needed.  As a last resort I went down to the Allen County Public Library and found a very helpful person who was able to guess at the reference it was alluding to, took me to the shelf and there is was!  Lesson learned.

I have always documented my sources (I have about 950 in Reunion) but this experience made me wonder if I was doing the best I could in my own work and convinced me to look at EE again.  Like you, I tried the templates in Reunion but found them restrictive and especially difficult to modify the punctuation so they printed in a readable and standard manner.

Even after studying many of the sections of the book and trying to understand the logic behind it all, I still struggled to find an efficient way to implement it.  Then one day I tried creating a 4” x 6” cards (see photo) for each major kind of source and rather than having to pick up the heavy book and look it up each time, I could use the cards as guides.  And so I did and it worked.  After adopting this aid and entering all my new sources using these cheat cards I was able to remember many of the formats without consulting the cards and now can write many of the sources from memory.

Making Evidence Explained easier

I put the cards in one of those cheap 4″ x 6” photo books that cost about a dollar and can flip through them quickly.  I love not having to return to looking them up in EE.

On the sample card the top portion guides a citation for a SS-5 (application for SS number) and is substantially different than the second citation for an on-line entry found in the SS Death Index.  Why is that important?  Because the application will contain the applicant’s birth date and place, the names of mother and father, and date of application.  The SS Death Index just provides the name, SS number, date of death and state where SS was issued.  If I were reviewing the sources in a book or report, the citation for the application would jump out at me.  I’d definitely want to consult that record!

In Reunion I now use the free form format to create a source.  I also do a lot of copy and pasting the citations from on-line sites into Reunion, particularly FamilySearch as they seem to have adopted much of the EE standard.  Often I use your idea of copy and paste in the preview section in the source window.  Over couple of days I was able to edit all 950 sources in my family file and am very pleased with the results.

The most important benefit to me is that my sources now are standard and consistent when I use the Book feature or report features in Reunion.  I am confident any researcher coming behind me will be able to locate the source without difficulty.

Another benefit is the EE citation will include the access date and this has been helpful on several sites such as Find A Grave because contributors often come back to add more information and that helps prompt me to remember to return to the site periodically for a particular ancestor.  And last, I noticed the EE citation often includes the birth and death dates of the person to help tell same-name ancestors apart.  For example, I have many John Boyers in my tree and now when I review sources it is clear to which person it refers (John Boyer 1785-1826).

I don’t hesitate to modify the EE format when I need to.  Often I will add a brief comment such as “this book contains four sections the pages of which are renumbered at the start of each section.”

A brief note about me: I am a “Roots generation” genealogist and the daughter of a career officer who served in WW II and a mother born in Texas.  I am retired from Parkview Health System in Fort Wayne, Indiana.  My current project is digitizing my father’s 300 letters he wrote home during the war.  I give presentations on my journey to discover his service record to genealogy groups, Air Force associations, and anyone else who cares to listen!  I have a son in Denver and twin sister in Indianapolis.

I think this is great food for thought and makes the idea of using the Evidenced Explained format less daunting and more compelling. I think I would probably use Evernote, rather than index cards, but the idea of using a “cheat sheet” to make it easier remains the same. Thank you, Karen!

How They Do It: D. Joshua Taylor

By 6 Comments

If you watch Genealogy Roadshow, you’re probably familiar with D. Joshua Taylor, a regular on the show. If you’re a member of genealogical society, you’re probably familiar with him, since he is a past president of  the Federation of Genealogical Societies. If you go to genealogy conferences, you may have heard him speak, since he’s a popular speaker in our field.

I had the pleasure of hearing him present four talks at the Genealogy Society of Southern Illinois’s annual conference in 2015. I blogged about his substantial time management wisdom shortly after the conference–and in that post revealed that I learned through one of his talks that Josh and I are cousins!

Josh obviously has a very impressive resume. (And he’s in his mid-thirties!) He is currently the president of the New York Genealogical and Biographical Society, America’s second oldest genealogical association. I was thrilled when he accepted my invitation to contribute a How They Do It interview. I bet you’ll be as impressed as I am that he took a year away from his research to focus on organizing his research materials. Enjoy!

How They Do It: D. Joshua Taylor

How long have you been doing genealogy?

More than 20 years at this point – though on a professional basis for the past 12.

What’s your favorite part of doing genealogy?

The unpredictable nature of “what’s next” in the process. Solving one question always leads to more – resulting in a perpetual process of discovery.

Do you consider your genealogy research well organized?

Yes! But only because I took a year away from research to focus specifically on organizing my materials. I find it impossible to conduct thorough research without a structured organization system in place.

What type of software do you use for organizing your genealogy research?

A variety of things. I use apps such as Trello to organize specific research projects; software programs like Roots Magic and Heredis to manage my family tree database, and a variety of spreadsheet and database tools to track my notes and documents.

Do you keep a research log? If so, what format?

Absolutely. My research log is part of a customized database I built for my research notes. However, it all started as a spreadsheet and then grew from there.

Do you have a tree on Ancestry? If so, is it public or private? Why?

Yes, though not a complete version of my tree. I keep a few online trees online at a time – all of which are strictly based in projects I am actively researching. These projects are largely private (though I don’t mind sharing when asked).

What’s your biggest challenge when it comes to organizing your genealogy?

Maintaining consistency within my organization system. The quantity and variety of materials can easily become overwhelming. My unwritten personal rule is that a research “trip” or “session” is never complete until I have spent the time analyzing and filing the materials I located. This forces me to consistently keep my materials orderly – but sometimes life gets in the way and the piles start to slowly build.

What’s your biggest piece of advice to beginning genealogists in terms of keeping track of their research?

Avoid being too specific. Why? Because your family history journey will eventually cross other geographic regions, multiple surnames, various record types, and other items that won’t easily fit into a strict tracking system. Leave the breadcrumb trail wherever possible.

We often narrow our focus too much on a single family or trying to find a particular maiden name. For example, we sometimes become so focused on finding a specific maiden name or a birth date but in reality, those might be very difficult (if not impossible) to find. So as such, we have to realize that we will need to venture “away” from the path we have planned as researchers.

What do you think is the most important thing for people to do to stay organized when it comes to family history research?

Never lose sight of the legacy you are building. Your research notes are just as important (if not more so) than the actual documents you uncover. Therefore, it is key that you find ways to organize and preserve those materials alongside the records you uncover.

If you were starting out new as a genealogist what would you do differently?

I’d avoid trying to research so many lines at once. The need to focus on a few families changed the way I could tackle specific research problems. A pedigree can be nearly unending, so taking it a piece at a time from the very beginning would have been a much better approach.

Do you keep paper or electronic files (or both)?

Both. I love paper and I also love the convenience of electronic files. My organization system allows me to keep a current paper file alongside a digital version of every document. While it requires diligence to keep both in sync, the payoff is well worth it.

Are you folder or binder person for your paper files?

Well…both. My documents that I know are attached to the tree end up in binders, organized by number. However my research notes for active projects are all in folders. I consider these to be active research files, while the binder is a more permanent solution.

Do you use Evernote, One Note or any other electronic organizing system for your genealogy? If so, how do you use it?

I have used both One Note and Evernote in the past and will sometimes use Evernote for specific projects. To me, the ability to tag notes by specific surnames, localities, and repositories was the key way I used Evernote – as an active storage place for my notes, thoughts, etc.

Do you have a dedicated space in your home for doing genealogy research? What’s it like?

Yes. In addition to my computer, my space includes binders of all my documents (to my left), key research aids and books (to my right), and my file cabinets of active research files (behind me). In addition, I have a dry-erase board on the wall I use to keep track of active research notes, projects, etc. My desk consists of an “inbox” where new documents and other materials are placed until they are filed.

Do you have anything to add?

Only this – the need to create an organization system that works for your research project is so essential. Different projects require varied approaches. The search for an individual’s parents might require a different approach than a complete study of an individual’s descendants.

There are lots of great nuggets in there, but  one that really jumped out at me was “My unwritten personal rule is that a research “trip” or “session” is never complete until I have spent the time analyzing and filing the materials I located.” I know that in the past I’ve happily gathered new documents and information without properly processing it, though I try hard now to focus on analysis, not discovery. Josh’s discipline in analyzing and organizing all his research materials is inspirational!

My June 2017 30 x 30 challenge

By 12 Comments

Back in August 2015, I created a 30 x 30 challenge, to challenge myself and my readers to doing at least 30 minutes of genealogy research for 30 days in a row. It was a great success for me personally.

I did another one in January 2016, but it was a failure. I blame the fact that I had a ten-week-old puppy, which is pretty much the biggest distraction I can imagine. I waited until November 2016 for the next and then did one this year in March. Those last two were great.

Here it is only two months since the end of my last challenge and I’m declaring another one. Here’s why:

  • I find when I don’t have a challenge going, it’s easy for me to put genealogy research on the back burner. A 30 x 30 challenge keeps genealogy front of mind.
  • Having accountability is really helpful. I’m the type of person who likes to live up to my public commitments.
  • Having an ending point helps keep me going–I think I’d give up if I declared I was going to do 30 minutes of genealogy research a day for the rest of my life.

In March, I added the commitment to log my research to the challenge. I’ll do that in June as well. And I’m going to up the commitment by trying to end each session with next steps, so I never have to spend time wondering what to work on. Having next steps is a habit I’d like to create and there’s no better way to create a habit than by doing that thing daily until it becomes automatic.

I’ll post updates a few times throughout the month. I’m excited to get started!

Will you join me? There are no rules except that for the month of June you make some kind of commitment to do something related to genealogy. Who’s in?